TU Berlin

Management im GesundheitswesenSaltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E (eds) (2002): Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European Health Care Systems. Buckingham: Open University Press

Inhalt des Dokuments

zur Navigation

Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European Health Care Systems

Autor
Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E (eds)

Verlag
Buckingham: Open University Press

 

 

Zusammenfassung

European national policy-makers broadly agree on the core objectives that their health care systems should pursue. The list is strikingly straightforward: universal access for all citizens, effective care for better health outcomes, efficient use of resources, high-quality services and responsiveness to patient concerns. It is a formula that resonates across the political spectrum and which, in various, sometimes inventive configurations, has played a role in most recent European national election campaigns.

Yet this clear consensus can only be observed at the abstract policy level. Once decision-makers seek to translate their objectives into the nuts and bolts of health system organization, common principles rapidly devolve into divergent, occasionally contradictory, approaches. This is, of course, not a new phenomenon in the health sector. Different nations, with different histories, cultures and political experiences, have long since constructed quite different institutional arrangements for funding and delivering health care services. The diversity of health system configurations that has developed in response to broadly common objectives leads quite naturally to questions about the advantages and disadvantages inherent in different arrangements, and which approach is ‘better’ or even ‘best’ given a particular context and set of policy priorities. These concerns have intensified over the last decade as policy-makers have sought to improve health system performance through what has become a European-wide wave of health system reforms. The search for comparative advantage has triggered – in health policy as in clinical medicine – increased attention to its knowledge base, and to the possibility of overcoming at least part of existing institutional divergence through more evidence-based health policy-making.

Navigation

Direktzugang

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe