Inhalt des Dokuments
Surrogate Outcomes in Health Technology Assessment: an international comparison
Autor | Velasco Garrido
M, Mangiapane S | |
Journal | Int J
Technol Assess Health Care 25: 315-322 | |
Zusammenfassung
[1]
- © Copyright??
[2]
- © Cambridge Journals
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Our aim was to review the
recommendations given by health technology assessment (HTA)
institutions in their methodological guidelines concerning the use of
surrogate outcomes in their assessments. In a second step, we aimed at
quantifying the role surrogate parameters take in assessment
reports.
Methods: We analyzed methodological
papers and guidelines from HTA agencies with International Network of
Agencies for Health Technology Assessment membership as well as from
institutions related to pharmaceutical regulation (i.e.,
reimbursement, pricing). We analyzed the use of surrogate outcomes in
a sample of HTA reports randomly drawn from the HTA database. We
checked methods, results (including evidence tables), and conclusions
sections and extracted the outcomes reported. We report descriptive
statistics on the presence of surrogate outcomes in the
reports.
Results: We identified thirty-four
methodological guidelines, twenty of them addressing the issue of
outcome parameter choice and the problematic of surrogate outcomes.
Overall HTA agencies call on caution regarding the reliance on
surrogate outcomes. None of the agencies has provided a list or
catalog of acceptable and validated surrogate outcomes. We extracted
the outcome parameter of 140 HTA reports. Only around half of the
reports determined the outcomes for the assessment prospectively.
Surrogate outcomes had been used in 62 percent of the reports.
However, only 3.6 percent were based upon surrogate outcomes
exclusively. All of them assessed diagnostic or screening technologies
and the surrogate outcomes were predominantly test
characteristics.
Conclusions: HTA institutions
seem to agree on a cautious approach to the use of surrogate outcomes
in technology assessment. Thorough assessment of health technologies
should not rely exclusively on surrogate outcomes.
Acknowledgements
This study originated in a
project commissioned and funded by the German Agency for Health
Technology Assessment (DAHTA@DIMDI) (HTA Report Grant 53–06). The
Agency is part of the German Institute for Medical Documentation and
Information, which is a federal authority subordinated to the Federal
Ministry of Health. The full report of the project will be published
in German during 2009 at www.dimdi.de/static/en/hta/index.htm
[3].
s/Cover_IJTAHC.jpg
9.publications/Cover_IJTAHC.jpg
t?fromPage=online&aid=5961384